Freesco, NND, CDN, EOS

Witam. Podczas logowania przez putty pinguje swój Access Point pod który jest podpięty jeden klient oto wyniki:
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=11 ttl=127 time=4.86 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=11 ttl=127 time=64.8 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=12 ttl=127 time=3.82 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=13 ttl=127 time=3.63 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=14 ttl=127 time=4.89 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=15 ttl=127 time=5.19 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=16 ttl=127 time=5.15 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=17 ttl=127 time=6.23 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=18 ttl=127 time=5.06 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=19 ttl=127 time=5.07 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=20 ttl=127 time=4.88 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=21 ttl=127 time=5.36 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=22 ttl=127 time=5.35 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=23 ttl=127 time=6.65 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=24 ttl=127 time=6.55 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=25 ttl=127 time=5.18 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=26 ttl=127 time=6.12 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=27 ttl=127 time=5.86 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=28 ttl=127 time=3.57 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=29 ttl=127 time=6.10 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=30 ttl=127 time=4.90 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=31 ttl=127 time=6.24 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=32 ttl=127 time=4.64 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=33 ttl=127 time=5.32 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=34 ttl=127 time=4.75 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=35 ttl=127 time=7.34 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=36 ttl=127 time=6.42 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=37 ttl=127 time=4.70 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=38 ttl=127 time=5.18 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=39 ttl=127 time=5.14 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=40 ttl=127 time=6.03 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=41 ttl=127 time=3.74 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=42 ttl=127 time=5.29 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=43 ttl=127 time=7.53 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=44 ttl=127 time=5.04 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=45 ttl=127 time=10.4 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=46 ttl=127 time=4.84 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=47 ttl=127 time=3.64 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=48 ttl=127 time=3.79 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=49 ttl=127 time=5.95 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=50 ttl=127 time=5.01 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=51 ttl=127 time=3.83 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=52 ttl=127 time=4.86 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=53 ttl=127 time=3.62 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=54 ttl=127 time=3.69 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=55 ttl=127 time=7.62 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=56 ttl=127 time=4.22 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=57 ttl=127 time=6.64 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=58 ttl=127 time=3.53 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=59 ttl=127 time=3.48 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=60 ttl=127 time=7.08 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=61 ttl=127 time=7.49 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=62 ttl=127 time=10.4 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=63 ttl=127 time=3.57 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=64 ttl=127 time=5.95 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=65 ttl=127 time=4.87 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=66 ttl=127 time=5.18 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=67 ttl=127 time=6.24 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=68 ttl=127 time=3.56 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.97: icmp_seq=69 ttl=127 time=5.05 ms

--- 192.168.0.97 ping statistics ---
69 packets transmitted, 69 received, +1 duplicates, 0% packet loss, time 68676ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 3.450/6.903/64.807/9.666 ms

CO TO SĄ TE DUPLIKATY ? (DUP)! Z CZEGO MOGĄ ONE SIĘ BRAĆ ? PRZY TYM DUP JEST TEŻ BARDZO WYSOKI PING W PORÓWANIU DO PRZECIĘTNYCH WYNIKÓW. CZY TO OZNACZA ŻE TEN KOLEŚ COŚ ROZDZIELA CZY POD NIEGO KTOŚ SOBIE MACA SKLONOWAŁ ? CZY TO JAKAŚ KOLIZJA ?

_________________
SERWER Duron 800Mhz 256MB Ram, HDD 250GB 25 userów DSL 15000 plus 2x AP

swiadczyc to moze o slabej jakosci linku do lienta, kiepskim sprzecie.

taki wynik jaki uzyskales nie jest powodem do paniki ale zastanowic sie mozna
wazne ze nie ma pakietow straconych.

Było już wałkowane użyj 'szukaj' DUP.

(na marginesie) Nie musisz też pokazywać 60 pingów z jednym DUP widzieliśmy tego masę...

_________________
Określenie przy nicku to tylko dla 'jaj'; tytuł za ilość postów.
Ja ciągle się uważam za niewinne dziecię w sprawach linuksa; żaden guru czy inny moderator