Freesco, NND, CDN, EOS http://forum.freesco.pl/ |
|
Wysoki Laod!!! Pomocy!!! http://forum.freesco.pl/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=15389 |
Strona 1 z 1 |
Autor: | Dawid [ sobota, 26 maja 2007, 17:41 ] |
Tytuł: | Wysoki Laod!!! Pomocy!!! |
Co jest grane? Przy ściąganiu czegoś z neta skacze mocno load. Transfery spadają i net siada. Często proces ksoftirqd_CPU0 zabiera ponad 85% procka. Od czego on jest? top - 17:40:30 up 1:11, 1 user, load average: 1.87, 1.67, 1.36 Tasks: 28 total, 4 running, 24 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 2.3% user, 97.7% system, 0.0% nice, 0.0% idle Mem: 124184k total, 36092k used, 88092k free, 10524k buffers Swap: 32756k total, 0k used, 32756k free, 15704k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 293 nobody 20 0 672 672 580 R 28.7 0.5 4:52.80 dnsmasq 4 root 19 19 0 0 0 R 10.4 0.0 4:57.80 ksoftirqd_CPU0 5284 dawid 9 0 1836 1836 1680 S 9.6 1.5 1:08.90 sshd 15476 root 15 0 956 956 772 R 3.8 0.8 0:01.96 top 15524 root 20 0 1040 1036 832 R 2.4 0.8 0:00.13 sh 3 root 9 0 0 0 0 S 1.3 0.0 0:26.47 kapmd 7 root 9 0 0 0 0 S 0.4 0.0 0:07.26 kupdated 15 root 9 0 0 0 0 S 0.4 0.0 0:29.08 kjournald 1 root 9 0 468 468 416 S 0.0 0.4 0:16.14 init 2 root 9 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.22 keventd 5 root 9 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kswapd 6 root 9 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 bdflush 8 root 9 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.53 xfsbufd 9 root 9 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 xfslogd/0 10 root 9 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 xfsdatad/0 14 root -1 -20 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 mdrecoveryd 121 root 9 0 572 572 492 S 0.0 0.5 0:03.85 syslogd 134 root 9 0 1500 1500 420 S 0.0 1.2 0:00.53 klogd 147 root 9 0 556 556 484 S 0.0 0.4 0:00.90 crond 162 root 8 0 1532 1532 1240 S 0.0 1.2 0:00.00 sshd 269 root 9 0 1444 1444 880 S 0.0 1.2 0:05.20 dhcpd 687 root 9 0 444 444 392 S 0.0 0.4 0:00.00 agetty 1618 root 9 0 444 444 392 S 0.0 0.4 0:00.00 agetty 5235 root 9 0 1760 1760 1628 S 0.0 1.4 0:00.34 sshd 5285 dawid 9 0 1532 1532 1188 S 0.0 1.2 0:00.06 bash 5308 root 9 0 788 788 676 S 0.0 0.6 0:00.01 su 5309 root 9 0 1468 1468 1128 S 0.0 1.2 0:00.40 bash 13063 root 11 0 1088 1084 968 S 0.0 0.9 0:06.74 niceshaper |
Autor: | JakubC [ sobota, 26 maja 2007, 20:32 ] |
Tytuł: | |
Ten proces odpowiada za kolejkowanie żądań obsługi przerwań. Jeśli system nie nadąża z bieżącą obsługą przerwań wówczas są one kolejkowane i obsługiwane w miarę możliwości. Sam procesor obciąża Ci zapewne nieceshaper lub ilość połączeń. Jaką masz maszynkę? |
Autor: | Dawid [ niedziela, 27 maja 2007, 07:38 ] |
Tytuł: | |
Dzięki za odpowiedź. Doszedłem co powodowało takie przeciążenie. Miałem wcześniej uruchomionego Squida i skrypt przekierowujący ruch Squida na IMQ, ale prawdopodobnie jest coś w nim zrypane, bo to on powodowal takie obciążenie. Teraz wynik TOP wygląda tak: top - 08:36:18 up 16:07, 1 user, load average: 0.04, 0.26, 0.28 Tasks: 38 total, 1 running, 37 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 0.0% user, 2.3% system, 0.0% nice, 97.7% idle Mem: 124184k total, 112288k used, 11896k free, 41208k buffers Swap: 32756k total, 0k used, 32756k free, 16536k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 17601 root 12 0 960 960 772 R 0.7 0.8 0:00.06 top 1 root 8 0 468 468 416 S 0.0 0.4 0:21.76 init 2 root 9 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.22 keventd 3 root 9 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:46.63 kapmd 4 root 19 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 11:57.13 ksoftirqd_CPU0 5 root 9 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.12 kswapd 6 root 9 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 bdflush 7 root 9 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:12.21 kupdated 8 root 9 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:01.08 xfsbufd 9 root 9 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 xfslogd/0 10 root 9 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 xfsdatad/0 14 root -1 -20 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 mdrecoveryd 15 root 9 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:53.67 kjournald 121 root 9 0 572 572 492 S 0.0 0.5 0:10.56 syslogd 134 root 9 0 1500 1500 420 S 0.0 1.2 0:00.53 klogd 147 root 8 0 556 556 484 S 0.0 0.4 0:01.57 crond 162 root 9 0 1532 1532 1240 S 0.0 1.2 0:05.03 sshd 687 root 9 0 444 444 392 S 0.0 0.4 0:00.00 agetty 1618 root 9 0 444 444 392 S 0.0 0.4 0:00.00 agetty 21009 root 8 0 1088 1084 968 S 0.0 0.9 3:00.92 niceshaper 21006 nobody 9 0 672 672 580 S 0.0 0.5 0:03.87 dnsmasq 32091 root 9 0 2284 2280 2164 S 0.0 1.8 0:00.08 httpd 388 root 9 0 1148 1144 920 S 0.0 0.9 0:00.14 mrtg.run 3664 nobody 9 0 2544 2540 2280 S 0.0 2.0 0:00.05 httpd 3665 nobody 9 0 2404 2400 2236 S 0.0 1.9 0:00.04 httpd 3666 nobody 9 0 2396 2392 2232 S 0.0 1.9 0:00.02 httpd 3667 nobody 9 0 2400 2396 2236 S 0.0 1.9 0:00.01 httpd 3672 nobody 9 0 2384 2380 2232 S 0.0 1.9 0:00.01 httpd 30101 nobody 9 0 2388 2384 2236 S 0.0 1.9 0:00.00 httpd 30116 nobody 9 0 2384 2380 2232 S 0.0 1.9 0:00.00 httpd 30117 nobody 9 0 2388 2384 2232 S 0.0 1.9 0:00.02 httpd 9085 root 9 0 1436 1436 872 S 0.0 1.2 0:00.08 dhcpd 16891 root 9 0 416 416 372 S 0.0 0.3 0:00.01 sleep 17552 root 9 0 1760 1760 1628 S 0.0 1.4 0:00.19 sshd 17572 dawid 9 0 1832 1832 1676 S 0.0 1.5 0:00.05 sshd 17573 dawid 9 0 1532 1532 1188 S 0.0 1.2 0:00.05 bash 17574 root 9 0 788 788 676 S 0.0 0.6 0:00.02 su 17593 root 9 0 1460 1460 1120 S 0.0 1.2 0:00.04 bash A mój komp tp PII 400 Mhz, 128 RAM, Apapche, Mrtg, Niceshaper Narazie wyłączyłem Squida. Czy ma ktoś może działający skrypt przekierowujący Squida na IMQ? |
Autor: | Dawid [ wtorek, 29 maja 2007, 17:48 ] |
Tytuł: | |
To jednak nie to. Po restarcie znów zaczęły się takie wpisy w kernel.log l May 29 17:41:13 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1040, some class has too small rate May 29 17:41:24 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1158, some class has too small rate May 29 17:41:25 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1058, some class has too small rate May 29 17:41:37 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1117, some class has too small rate May 29 17:41:38 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1017, some class has too small rate May 29 17:41:50 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1086, some class has too small rate May 29 17:42:02 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1217, some class has too small rate May 29 17:42:03 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1117, some class has too small rate May 29 17:42:04 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1017, some class has too small rate May 29 17:42:16 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1121, some class has too small rate May 29 17:42:17 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1021, some class has too small rate May 29 17:42:29 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1150, some class has too small rate May 29 17:42:30 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1050, some class has too small rate May 29 17:42:33 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1121, some class has too small rate May 29 17:42:42 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1275, some class has too small rate May 29 17:42:43 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1175, some class has too small rate May 29 17:42:44 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1075, some class has too small rate May 29 17:42:46 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1183, some class has too small rate May 29 17:42:47 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1046, some class has too small rate May 29 17:42:56 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1127, some class has too small rate May 29 17:42:57 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1027, some class has too small rate May 29 17:42:59 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1311, some class has too small rate May 29 17:43:02 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1028, some class has too small rate May 29 17:43:09 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1156, some class has too small rate May 29 17:43:10 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1027, some class has too small rate May 29 17:43:14 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1329, some class has too small rate May 29 17:43:15 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1229, some class has too small rate May 29 17:43:16 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1129, some class has too small rate May 29 17:43:17 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1029, some class has too small rate May 29 17:43:21 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1166, some class has too small rate May 29 17:43:22 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1066, some class has too small rate May 29 17:43:28 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1175, some class has too small rate May 29 17:43:34 netwifi kernel: NET: 1 messages suppressed. May 29 17:43:34 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1243, some class has too small rate May 29 17:43:35 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1134, some class has too small rate May 29 17:43:48 netwifi kernel: NET: 1 messages suppressed. May 29 17:43:48 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1187, some class has too small rate May 29 17:43:49 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1087, some class has too small rate May 29 17:44:01 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1157, some class has too small rate May 29 17:44:02 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1057, some class has too small rate May 29 17:44:14 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1110, some class has too small rate May 29 17:44:15 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1010, some class has too small rate May 29 17:43:48 netwifi kernel: HTB: mindelay=1187, some class has too small rate Mam skonfigurowanego niceshapera i ruch p2p przekierowany na IMQ. Czy ktoś wie co to może powodować? |
Autor: | -MW- [ wtorek, 29 maja 2007, 21:24 ] |
Tytuł: | |
skonfiguruj poprawnie niceshapera jedna z klas jest niepoprawna. moze ustawiles cos na zero? |
Autor: | Dawid [ środa, 30 maja 2007, 06:40 ] |
Tytuł: | |
Prawdopodobnie zrobiłem błąd w pliku p2p_imq_eth. Dałem złe wartości przycinania. Nie były wielkokrotnością 8. Po zmianie jak narazie wszystko hula. |
Strona 1 z 1 | Strefa czasowa UTC+2godz. |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |